The Word Of the Week is a totally new one to me, and quite useful, psychologically. It is
To draw conclusions that do not follow logically from a given set of assumptions.
Paralogize entered English from Medieval Latin paralogizāre, from Greek paralogízesthai meaning “to reason falsely.” It’s been used in English since the late 1500s.
I’ve mentioned that the examples given, often do not relate well to the chosen word. One example for this word is;
“A brick,” he retorted, “is a parallelogram; I am not a parallelogram, and therefore not a brick …” “Charley Lightheart, you paralogize.” Stewart Edward White and Samuel Hopkins Adams, The Mystery, 1907
I would like to object that the conclusion drawn is valid, but must admit that the authors are British, and members of a group which uses the word ‘brick’ in a very different sense.
Brick – a decent, generous, reliable person (1830s+ British students)
So it is the assumption which is at fault here, although I can’t imagine why Charlie would object to being called one.
Like the ‘No True Scotsman Theorem’, this is a term that I can use to label the Religiously Restrictive, when they play the ‘Who’s Going To Be Saved’ game. They claim, “I’m Christian, and I’m good! You’re not Christian, therefore you are evil!”
This is like Super-paralogizing. Neither any of the assumptions, nor the conclusions, are valid.
This week’s candidate was caught associating with the likes of; whiffler, muckrake, bonzer, juggernaut, and troglodyte.