In the middle of a pile of feel-good, but unproven, religious claims, the amateur Christian Apologist suddenly – CLEARLY – wrote….
But we know genocide is evil. Since it IS morally wrong, we know there must be a standard beyond us which is the standard of goodness, righteousness, and justice. That standard is God. And without God, you can’t say genocide is wrong because that’s just your opinion.
If genocide is evil, and morally wrong, why does the God of the Bible not only condone it, but urge and support it??! I’d ask the Amalekites, but…. you know. 😳
The Amalekites were burning their new born babies over statues as a sacrifice to their gods. They were raping and murdering people. That’s who they were. They were evil and wicked people.
Is genocide evil and immoral, or not??! You posited a concrete, objective statement that it was, with God as the good, moral, righteous and just basis. Now you seem to be claiming that even though God caused and aided the genocide, the people who were wiped out deserved it.
Maybe they did, but you can’t have it both ways. Now your claims and morals, and the morals of your God, are suspect and subjective. Even your God’s little flood snit-fit to cover the fact that He had made a mistake, and was not in control, was the greatest example of genocide ever recorded…. or made up. The Egyptians and the Chinese don’t seem to have noticed it. 😯
One of my readers wondered why I seem to avoid addressing good Christian arguments, and only pick on the stupid ones. Partly, it’s because of the entertainment value, but it’s mostly because there are no ‘good’ Christian arguments – only less stupid ones. It’s all low-hanging fruit.
A young – but none too bright – Apologist has his own YouTube channel, where he posts videos refuting Atheists’ claims, although it often seems as if the whole point is to make Atheists look good. He supported Ray Comfort’s Holy Banana theory, until an Atheist shot it down in flames.
He recently posted a video in which he, in all apparent seriousness, claimed that, Evolution must be false, because it’s racist. Darwinism relies on “Survival of the Fittest,” and, if we evolved from African-Americans, how could there still be African-Americans??
If Americans came from Europeans, why are there still Europeans??! If God created us from dust, why is there still dust??! So few words – so many mistakes/lies.
Apologists don’t even like to use the word Evolution, lest it gain some validation. They use the pejorative, Darwinism, dismissing it like crystals, or reiki, or horoscopes. It does not ‘rely on’ Survival of the Fittest – which does not mean what this racist little fuck seems to think it does. And, “Evolved from African-Americans”??! He’s not even smart enough to deny that we evolved from monkeys. 😳
A 15-year-old, male Atheist, tired of listening to his Bible-thumper mother, conned her into calling in to The Atheist Experience podcast. With absolutely no training in Theology, Philosophy, logic or debate, she faced a moderator who was.
She tried to present a variety of silly, unprovable, kindergarten-level claims, which he quickly and easily refuted. Her defense then was that he had spoken sternly to her and embarrassed her in front of her son. The poor dear! For many of them, that’s what it comes down to. Some of them need to be spoken to, sternly. 👿