A Christian Apologist walked into a bar….
No he didn’t. Don’t be silly. They don’t walk into bars.
He walked into a church and had some communion wine because
Jesus turned water into wine, and said alcohol is good for you.
He made some drunken accusations about a well-known Atheist.
I accused him of Tu Quoque.
(Which means Christians do the same things, but claim to be better than everybody else)
He denied it, and claimed that I was ‘projecting.’
He said – She said
The rest is THISTORY
Frustrated and angry about the ongoing actions and attitudes of Christians, Christianity, the Christian Church, and specifically the Catholic Church, P Z Meyers indulged in a little hypothetical hyperbole. To present it as if you believed it literally, is either incredibly naïve, or an intentional lie. Likewise, to take the angry rant of one Atheist, and present it as if it were somehow The Official Atheist Position, is also naïve or a lie.
You admit that Meyers supposedly has the same actions and attitudes that some Christians do. To castigate the Atheist, and then even imply that Christians still hold the moral high ground is the Tu Quoque fallacy that I mentioned. This is not projection! This is cold, hard logic, and demonstrable fact.
You complained that Meyers advocated (he didn’t) burning down the churches of the very Indigenous People he tries to support. These are the same churches which were thrust, unwanted, upon them – which stifled and strangled their native spirituality – and treated them like shit for centuries. Meyers honestly believes that they would be better off without them. Mentioning burning them down is a bit over-the-top, for effect. I agree with Schadenfreude’s suggestion that they could be made much better use of in other, non-church ways.
As for the old Nazi-wannabe…. Meyers does not believe in Heaven or Hell. He doesn’t think that there will ever be any final punishment for this man’s evil ways. Even if God and Heaven were to exist, he can still sneak out through the Holy loophole by confessing his sins and asking for forgiveness.
Fair is where you take your pig to have it judged, but Meyers obviously feels that the universe would a little fairer place if this man suffered in retribution in the here and now – the only time and place that we can be sure that he will pay for his many transgressions.
Kevin, below, wants to write him a free pass because he wasn’t quite the asshole that Hitler was. This was only through lack of ability and lack of opportunity, not through any lack of trying. His ideology – his evil – his sin – is precisely the same. Any difference in size is irrelevant.
In your follow-up post, you maunder on about Meyers putting someone through a wood-chipper. He would not do such a thing! He did not even advocate that anyone should do this! What he PRECISELY said was, if all that Regnery did, was put one person into a wood-chipper, as horrible and gruesome as that might be, it would still be less evil and cause less pain and suffering to others, than what Regnery has achieved over many years.
Your rants might have a firmer base if you stopped assigning thoughts and claims to others, and studied and understood satire, sarcasm, and hyperbole. But then, what’s the fun of dishing out the truth? 😯